My Photographic Equipment
| First Camera |
Getting Serious |
Going Digital |
Scanning |
| Software |
Camera Bags |
Printing |
Lens Tests |
Here is part of my current line-up, I've switched to Micro 4/3 Olympus system. I love it:
Small and light! 2X crop factor, 16.1 Mpixel. I switched to M4/3 due to size, weight and cost.
Back row of lenses (L-R):
LUMIX G Vario 100-300mm F/4.0-5.6 MEGA O.I.S.
Olympus Zuiko M 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R
LUMIX G VARIO 7-14mm f/4.0 ASPH
LUMIX 35-100mm f/2.8 G Vario
Front row of lenses (L-R):
Olympus Zuiko M ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6
Olympus Zuiko M ED 45mm f1.8
Olympus 9mm f8.0 Fisheye Body Cap Lens BCL-0980
Extension tube set
Here are the thoughts of some others on micro 4/3 vs. DSLR (FF and APS-C):
By Ki Thomas, 11 Key Differences (Ki Thomas is a freelance photographer, filmmaker, graphic designer and writer based in the UK)
By Christography (He is a licensed Photography teacher, NYC)
By Steve Huff (A Photographer for a few decades, enthusiat/blogger)
Current rig:
Olympus OM-D E-M5 and M10 (several bodies; the M5 is the main one), crop factor = 2.0
What I actually walk around with:
Olympus OM-D E-M5
LUMIX G X Vario, 12-35MM, f/2.8 ASPH. (24mm-70mm equivalent, my walk-around lens)
LUMIX 35-100mm f/2.8 G Vario (70-200mm equivalent)
LUMIX G Vario 7-14mm f/4.0 ASPH (14-28mm equivalent)
Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.8 (90mm equivalent)
Olympus 9mm f/8.0 Fisheye Body Cap Lens (18mm equivalent)
MEKE 3.5mm f2.8 220 Degree Manual Focus Circular Fisheye Lens
Image taken with LUMIX G X Vario, 12-35MM, f/2.8 ASPH.
Image taken with LUMIX 35-100mm f/2.8 G Vario
Image taken with LUMIX G Vario 7-14mm f/4.0 ASPH
Image taken with Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.8
Image taken with Olympus 9mm f/8.0 Fisheye Body Cap Lens
Image taken with MEKE 3.5mm f2.8 220 Degree Manual Focus Circular Fisheye Lens
Image taken with LUMIX G Vario 100-300mm f/4.0-5.6 MEGA O.I.S.
Full lens list:
LUMIX G X Vario, 12-35MM, f/2.8 ASPH. (24mm-70mm equivalent, my walk-around lens)
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm f/1.8 (150mm equivalent)
Olympus 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 (28-82mm equivalent)
Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.8 (90mm equivalent)
Panasonic LUMIX G Vario 100-300mm f/4.0-5.6 MEGA O.I.S. (200-600mm equivalent)
Panasonic LUMIX 35-100mm f/2.8 G Vario (70-200mm equivalent)
Panasonic LUMIX G VARIO 7-14mm f/4.0 ASPH (14-28mm equivalent)
Panasonic LUMIX G 14mm f/2.5 II ASPH (28mm equivalent)
Olympus 9mm f/8.0 Fisheye Body Cap Lens (18mm equivalent)
Olympus M. 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 R (80-300mm equivalent)
Olympus M ED 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 (18-36mm equivalent)
MEKE 3.5mm f2.8 220 Degree Manual Focus Circular Fisheye Lens
LUMIX DMC-LX5 compact camera
And my LUMIX DMC-LX5, which bascially acts like a tiny DSLR, but without interchangeable lenses
and through the lens optical viewing. My main highlights of the LUMIX are:
RAW format available
All-manual operation (including focus)
LEICA SUMMICRON 5.1mm - 19mm zoom (35mm film equiv. 24mm - 90mm)
Lens speed! f/2.0 - f/3.3
ISO range of 80 - 12,000
Mode dial (M, S, A, etc.) just like on a DLSR
Previous DLSR rig:
Black K-5 body
Black K-X body
Navy K-X body
Pentax DA 17-70mm f/4.0
Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8
Pentax DA 15mm f/4 Limited
Pentax DA 40mm f/2.8 Limited
Pentax DA 70mm f/2.4 Limited
PentaxDA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 fisheye
Pentax DA 100mm f/2.8 macro WR
Pentax DA* 300mm f/4
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8
Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0-5.6
Sigma 150-500mm f/5.6-6.3
Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8
First Camera:
I had been using PENTAX cameras and lenses (until 2015) since I was about 17 years old (that would be
in 1978) when I bought my first camera: A PENTAX K-1000, all-manual camera that came with
an M-Series 50mm f/2.0 lens. This was a great starting camera. I still have two K-1000 bodies
(not that I've shot any film in the last 6 years!)
My Dad taught me photography. He had done darkroom work (black and white film, mainly
Plus-X-Pan) including film and print developing, and Kodachrome slides for years. Our home was filled
with art (my Mom and Dad sketched and painted), books of art, and photography. We swam
in a sea of visual (2-D) arts. My Dad took me into the darkroom, even before I had that
first camera, and taught me film development and black and white printing. You can see a lot
of the B&W work at my Old Minnesota page. I used to "help" him before I had my own camera.
I was fascinated by the darkroom and the printing process especially.
As soon as I got to college, I met Kent Reed at the Bulletin Room (3 Coffey Hall, St Paul Campus
of the University of Minnesota). Kent had NIKON gear, a couple F-2 bodies and some prime
lenses. This motivated me to buy more and better gear. When I moved to Seattle, I had an ME-Super
body, MX body, and the K-1000, along with a a set of M-Series lenses: 20mm f/4, 28mm f/2.8,
50mm f/2.0, 135mm f/3.5. You can see work with these lenses on my Old Minnesota page, my
Canadian Rockies page, and my Climbing Page (and the Ptarmigan Traverse, Mt. McKinley,
and Bailey Traverse pages).
Getting Serious:
In 1990, I began to acquire many more lenses and an L-X body (a magnificent camera), a one-time
bonus from Boeing helped. I was getting ready for my bicycle trip around the world with Jeff Mellor.
I knew I wanted to take a lot of good photos on this trip. I bought a range of new A-Series PENTAX
lenses: 16mm f/2.8 fisheye, 20mm f/2.8, 40mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.2, 200mm f/4, 400mm f/5.6 plus
a matching 2X converter. I also acquired a number of PENTAX zoom lenses and a very good
TOKINA ATX-Series 80-200mm f/2.8. On the trip, I picked up an M-Series 85mm f/2.0 (super
sharp portrait lens) and an M-Series 400-600 f/11 mirror zoom lens. The work with these lenses
is best seen in my Glacier National Park 1990 page, my World Bicycle Tour page, and my 1990s page.
I shot over 13,000 Kodachrome 64 slides on the world tour.
PENTAX LX body:
I have now sold all of these lenses:
PENTAX M 20mm f/4 (one of my all time favorite lenses)
PENTAX 85mm f/2.0 (one of my all time favorite lenses)
PENTAX 50mm f/1.2
PENTAX 20mm f/2.8
(terrific wide angle lens)PENTAX 16mm f/2.8 fisheye
PENTAX 40mm f/2.8
PENTAX 28mm f/2.8
PENTAX 135mm f/3.5
PENTAX 200mm f/4
PENTAX 400mm f/5.6
and mated 2X A-XL converter (Rear Converter-A 2X-L)PENTAX 400-600mm f/8-12
TOKINA ATX 80-200mm f/2.8
Going Digital:
Top | Bottom
I didn't do much photography from about 1999, when I went to France and Italy for a month, until
about 2003, when I got my first small digital camera, a Canon Powershot 100 2.1 MPixel camera.
At this time, I became very intensely involved in guitar making and guitar playing and photography
definitely took a back seat for quite a few years.
Later, I got an updated version of the CANON: The SD-1100IS, which I like a lot and has
8
Mpixel images. It's nice for snapshots and times I don't want to haul the
big rig with me.
I really shot nothing but snap shots until 2006, when Phyllis bought me a PENTAX *ist with an
18-55mm and 50-200mm kit lenses, to which she later added the 14mm f/2.8 super-wide angle.
After a couple of years, I was getting more serious about photography again, and I wanted more resolution
than the 6.1 MPixel image of the *ist and the kit lenses. I got the new PENTAX K-X, and a set of new
lenses that incorporate rare-earth glass, aspherical designs, and large apertures:
And, here it is in action in France, 2010:
Scanning:
Top | Bottom
The great bulk of the photos you see on this site were scanned to digital using the EPSON V500 Perfection
photo scanner. I really love it for slides, color and B&W negatives, prints, and it does nice pdfs as well. Using
the scanner and Photoshop Elements, I was able to salvage a large number of slightly off-exposure slides and
make them look beautiful.
Printing:
I am printing photos using the CANON PIXMA Pro9000 MkII printer. This is an amazing printer
that produces results that are better than photographic processing. The prints are crisp, brilliant,
and they knock your socks off. CANON claims better no-fade life than any photographic material.
I highly recommend this printer. I also recommend that you stick with CANON inks for it and I also
recommend the CANON Glossy II paper. Wonderful results. I had clogging and streaking problems
with non-CANON inks. Not worth the lower price!
Software:
It has been well said that software is the new darkroom. This is certainly true in my case.
I am now using Lightroom 3 and PhotoShop CS5. I love Lightroom: The fastest, best way
to organize and adjust photos, as far as I can see. I'm just getting going learning how to use
layers in PS5. I still use PS Elements (8) regularly, for quick spot cloning and cropping, or
just a quick adjustment. The exposure controls, noise reduction, and other IQ adjustments
seem easier to use and more intuitive to me in LR.
Camera Bags:
I am now using various Crumpler (5-million dollar home) and Tenba (Messenger DNA,
sizes 8, 9, and 10, depending on what I am carrying.)
The crumpler is my hiking bag. Very secure and protective in the outdoors.
Tripods:
I still have the Bogen 3020 tripod I got in 1980 and it still works great. But it has been
susperseded by a Manfrotto 055 with a Manfrotto MHXPRO-3W X-PRO 3-Way Head.
This tripod is pretty beefy and gets tall enough for me (also gets very low to the ground),
carries a heavy load, but is still manageable for carrying it around.
I also have a Gitzo Student tripod with a ball head, when I want a smaller, lighter tripod.
The Gitzo was purchased in 1990 for my bicycle trip around the world and rode with
me, strapped outside to the back of my rear pack on the bike.
Lens Tests:
None for now Top | Bottom
Top
| First Camera |
Getting Serious |
Going Digital |
Scanning |
| Software |
Camera Bags |
Printing |
Lens Tests |
PENTAX
Lenses
Background image is
Misty Cascade Range Mountains, near Seattle, late 1990s Last updated: